<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ZWorld - The World to Come &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zworld.com.au/category/theology/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zworld.com.au</link>
	<description>A New Approach to Biblical Theology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:17:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Misapplied Passages — Does Hosea teach what men should do in marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/08/04/misapplied-passages-does-hosea-teach-what-men-should-do-in-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/08/04/misapplied-passages-does-hosea-teach-what-men-should-do-in-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/08/04/misapplied-passages-does-hosea-teach-what-men-should-do-in-marriage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have decided to write about this topic as misapplying Hosea has been causing harm to many Christian men. I will not give an exposition on the passage, it is quite simple. Read it for yourselves. Many churches and bible colleges teach that once a wife cheats and leaves the husband the man shall never [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/08/04/misapplied-passages-does-hosea-teach-what-men-should-do-in-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Throne of God and Water of Life — what are they?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/05/26/throne-of-god-and-water-of-life-what-are-they/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/05/26/throne-of-god-and-water-of-life-what-are-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 23:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kingdom of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/05/26/throne-of-god-and-water-of-life-what-are-they/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did Jesus declare his deity when he claimed he could quench thirst on the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles? We read the following: Jn. 7:37 On the last day of the feast, the great day, Jesus stood up and proclaimed, “If any one thirst, let him come to me and drink. 38 He [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2007/05/26/throne-of-god-and-water-of-life-what-are-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter and the Great Sheet — common and unclean animals</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/peter-and-the-great-sheet-common-and-unclean-animals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/peter-and-the-great-sheet-common-and-unclean-animals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/peter-and-the-great-sheet-common-and-unclean-animals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me share a few thoughts on Peter’s vision of a great sheet descending with all kinds of animals in it. Did the vision meant the abrogation of the food laws as traditional Christian theologians claim? Or perhaps the passage was meant to communicate a different idea. Let us read it: Acts 10:9 The next [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/peter-and-the-great-sheet-common-and-unclean-animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Romans 14 — are the food laws abrogated</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/thoughts-on-romans-14-are-the-food-laws-abrogated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/thoughts-on-romans-14-are-the-food-laws-abrogated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 10:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/thoughts-on-romans-14-are-the-food-laws-abrogated/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How often has the above chapter been used as proof text that the law (particularly the food laws) is abrogated? Does it really teach that keeping the laws of God isn’t necessary? Well, if these laws are abrogated, then one can be faithful, while disobeying the food laws. But does this passage really teach that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/10/28/thoughts-on-romans-14-are-the-food-laws-abrogated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Romans 3 — the faith of Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/09/28/thoughts-on-romans-3-the-faith-of-jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/09/28/thoughts-on-romans-3-the-faith-of-jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 10:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Righteousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saved / Unsaved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/09/28/thoughts-on-romans-3-the-faith-of-jesus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Ch. 1 and 2 Paul establishes that the general condition of mankind — both Jews and Gentiles — is pretty bleak. There is a horrible sin problem in both camps (we have seen earlier that the language of the Bible is not all-inclusive). He then concludes: Rom 3:19 Now we know that whatever the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/09/28/thoughts-on-romans-3-the-faith-of-jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sin Nature — or lack of training in righteousness?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/07/23/sin-nature-or-lack-of-training-in-righteousness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/07/23/sin-nature-or-lack-of-training-in-righteousness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Birth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/07/23/sin-nature-or-lack-of-training-in-righteousness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea of some kind of sin nature — along with many other ideas — was developed throughout the latter part of the early centuries. Spare me from digging out the “when”, you can find plenty of info on Google if you dig hard enough. The JewFAQ has a very good article about what Jews [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/07/23/sin-nature-or-lack-of-training-in-righteousness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lie of Rahab — or is it?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/06/06/the-lie-of-rahab-or-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/06/06/the-lie-of-rahab-or-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/06/06/the-lie-of-rahab-or-is-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Joshua 2 we read about the harlot of Jerico, Rahab. She secretly receives two Israelite spies into her house and when the soldiers of the city come to search for them she lies to save their lives. Now the question is whether she sinned or not? There are various views about it and we [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/06/06/the-lie-of-rahab-or-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hebrews 10 — what is abolished?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/05/02/hebrews-10-what-is-abolished/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/05/02/hebrews-10-what-is-abolished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 03:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covenants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/05/02/hebrews-10-what-is-abolished/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The passage in question is often used as a prooftext that the law was abolished in order to establish the new covenant. If it was so, what we call “new covenant” is not the new covenant of Jeremiah, which is the law in the heart, not the absence of the law. Let us consider the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/05/02/hebrews-10-what-is-abolished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Isa 53 — my solution</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/03/isa-53-my-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/03/isa-53-my-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jewish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading Rabbi Schulman’s commetary we realise that the servant of God spoken of by Isaiah is the righteous remnant of Israel in the messianic times. How can that be still applied to Jesus? How did he fulfill these prophecies? Are the gospel writers at fault when they claim he did fulfil these prophecies? I suggest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/03/isa-53-my-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Replacement Theology — what’s wrong with it?</title>
		<link>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/01/replacement-theology-whats-wrong-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/01/replacement-theology-whats-wrong-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Covenants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exclusivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zworld.com.au/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This theology has been held by various churches right from the early centuries. It says that God changed his mind and now all promises and blessings made to Israel go to the Church. Israel totally lost God’s favour and they have no place in God’s future plan as a nation, except as part of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zworld.com.au/2006/04/01/replacement-theology-whats-wrong-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
